Top Panel





Home :: News :: 28072010
Notorious Tiger Poacher Convicted

 
28 July, 2010.
 
New Delhi: In a major victory for tiger conservation in India, notorious tiger poacher Dariya and his wife Bhagwati were convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 today by Justice A.K. Dwivedi, Judicial Magistrate First Class in Sihora, Jabalpur district of Madhya Pradesh. The trial of this case has been pending for more than 21 years. The prosecution of this case was conducted on behalf of the Forest Department by Advocate Ms Manjula Shrivastava, a lawyer of the Wildlife Protection Society of India (WPSI).
 
Dariya has been sentenced to 3 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- for violations of sections 9, 39 and 51 of the Act while his wife Bhagwati has been sentenced to the same quantum of punishment, with one and a half years of probation, for violations of sections 9, 51 and 52 of the Act. This is one of the few cases in which a person has been convicted for abetment of offences under Section 52 of the Act.
 
The case itself dates back to 1988 when Dariya and his wife, along with 7 other accomplices, were arrested in Bahoriband range of the then Jabalpur Territorial Division in Madhya Pradesh and 1 tiger skin, tiger bones, 4 tiger paws, 3 cans of tiger fat, 1 hyena skin and 8 spring traps were seized from them. Unfortunately, all the accused were granted bailed and subsequently absconded, leaving the trial of the case pending for more than 21 years.
 
Dariya was arrested again on 28th April 2008 at Corbett Tiger Reserve with 2 tiger traps and other poaching equipment, but was once again granted bail after a few months. On 27 March 2009, officers of the Katni Forest Division arrested Dariya and his wife in Ramnagar, Uttarakhand, based on information provided by WPSI. Both were posing as beggars in a market in Ramnagar when they were arrested.
 
Dariya and his wife are both residents of Samalkha, Panipat district in Haryana. The notorious wildlife criminal Sansar Chand allegedly mentioned Dariya as an expert poacher during his interrogation by the CBI in 2005.
 
According to information available with WPSI, in the last decade (2000-2009) over 882 people have been accused in tiger cases (including tiger poaching and the seizure of tiger parts) but only 18 people have been convicted for tiger related offences in 6 court cases so far. This conviction is one more such rare instance, and comes fresh on the heels of the seizure of a tiger skin by the Chandur Railway Police in Maharashtra on 27 July 2010.

 

 

  Untitled Document
 Search:







TIGER NEWS



Two tigers die of poisoning in Gudalur, 21st Aug., 2024


Thai tigers bounce back from the edge of extinction after capture of high-profile poachers, 5th Aug., 2024


Previous



WILDLIFE NEWS


Villagers block highway over chinkara poaching in Suratgarh, 21st Aug., 2024

Wildlife warrior Godilla Vishwanatha Reddy: A sincere, humble conservationist, 21st July, 2024

Previous


PROJECTS


Tiger Poaching & Illegal Wildlife Trade Investigations




TIGER MORTALITY

TIGER DEATHS IN 2024
 Mortality                   114
 Poaching &             
 Seizures                      24
___________________
       Total                     138


TIGER DEATHS IN 2023
 Mortality                 149
 Poaching &               56
 Seizures                   
___________________
       Total                   205


TIGER POACHING 1994-2023


LEOPARD MORTALITY

LEOPARD DEATHS IN 2024
 Mortality                384
 Poaching &            125
 Seizures             
___________________
       Total                  509


LEOPARD DEATHS IN 2023
 Mortality                 410
 Poaching &             155
 Seizures             
___________________
       Total                   565
     

LEOPARD POACHING 1994-2023



TIGER RESERVES
Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve Map 

Bandhavgarh



Jobs

Assitant Accountant


 
Untitled Document
  About us | ProjectsNewsThe TigerDonations | How To Help Links| Publications | Crime MapsFAQsContact Us

Wildlife Protection Society of India. All material is protected by law.